Zimbabwe News Online: Boyfriend demands virginity proof from girl friend

Boyfriend demands virginity proof from girl friend
================================================================================
sunday news on 19 July, 2010 01:37:00
 
Kevin Mahlangu (34) of 6 Sandalwood Crescent, Baobab Hill in Hwange, owner of
Hwange Pharmacy and Insomnia Leisure Centre, in his plea through his lawyers,
Mabhikwa, Hikwa and Nyathi Legal Practitioners to the High Court case number HC
901/10 dated 14 June, states that it is true that he was once in love with the
plaintiff (Rumbidzai Gwese aged 21) of 513 Empumalanga Township in Hwange, but
denies promising to marry her. He further said there is no basis at law to claim
such damages.
Gwese filed a lawsuit against Mahlangu (complainant) to pay for damages arising
from alleged breach of promise to marry, sexual abuse, risk of being infected
with HIV/AIDS as well as the cost of the lawsuit.
The plaintiff is demanding US$15 000 for breach of promise to marry, US$15 000
for sexual abuse and another US$15 000 for the risk of being infected with
HIV/AIDS as well as the cost of the lawsuit.
However, the defendant has denied all the allegations levelled against him
through his plea of which a copy is in the hands of this paper. Responding to
the allegations that he broke the plaintiff’s virginity after being intimate
with her four times on the night of 5 March he said:
“No issues arise save to state that defendant was never aware of plaintiff’s
sexual history. Plaintiff is put to the strict proof thereof.
“Defendant never promised plaintiff to marry her. Plaintiff is put to proof
thereof. Defendant further denies making an undertaking to Plaintiff’s uncle
to marry Plaintiff. Plaintiff is put to strict proof of her allegation,’’
read part of the plea.
The plaintiff alleged that the complainant made an undertaking to marry her
through giving her uncle US$20 after discussions pertaining to the matter on 17
March.
In her declaration the plaintiff states that the defendant chased her away from
his house alleging that he had lost affection and love. However, the defendant
said: “Plaintiff left defendant’s residence because defendant had lost love
and affection for plaintiff’s uncouth conduct more particularly that;
plaintiff once assaulted defendant using catapult propelled pebbles.
Plaintiff has no respect at all to defendant’s relatives including
defendant’s father whom she insulted in his absence from time to time.
Plaintiff has insulted and verbally abused defendant and Plaintiff has indicated
that she does not recognise defendant’s child whom she has verbally abused and
insulted, read part of the plea. Last Friday the plaintiff applied for a
pre-trial memorandum to further defend her case.